PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.07%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-29.08%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.18%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.38%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.94%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
128.01%
G&A growth above 1.5x ZETA's 15.05%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-2.24%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.83%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
3.66%
Total costs growth less than half of ZETA's 11.77%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
161.11%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-29.90%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.13%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.90%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.17%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
18.10%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-26.00%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.79%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.03%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-25.99%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.77%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.13%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.19%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.23%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.