PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.62%
Revenue growth below 50% of ZETA's 16.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
3.45%
Cost growth less than half of ZETA's 29.86%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
5.98%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of ZETA's 8.15%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
0.34%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.14%
Similar R&D growth to ZETA's 14.15%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.92%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.00%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x ZETA's 11.77%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.21%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.43%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.21%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.99%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
75.81%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.94%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.43%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.24%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
44.36%
Similar net income growth to ZETA's 40.68%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
36.68%
Net margin growth 50-75% of ZETA's 49.14%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
41.67%
Similar EPS growth to ZETA's 41.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
47.83%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.99%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.00%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.