PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.13%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.13%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-3.01%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.18%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-10.41%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.91%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.59%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.02%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
35.36%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
64.92%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
35.36%
Operating income growth 50-75% of ZETA's 68.32%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
41.20%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of ZETA's 72.84%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-41.97%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
17.90%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.98%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
776.40%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.11%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.45%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.71%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.71%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.49%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.46%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.