PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.41%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-20.38%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.78%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.88%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.03%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.89%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.02%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.60%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.02%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.41%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.28%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.87%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
50.40%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.39%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
29.26%
Pre-tax margin growth 50-75% of ZETA's 50.07%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
9.30%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.98%
Net income growth 50-75% of ZETA's 40.68%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
34.28%
Net margin growth 50-75% of ZETA's 49.14%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
25.00%
EPS growth 50-75% of ZETA's 41.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of ZETA's 41.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-2.55%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.27%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.