PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.01%
Similar revenue growth to ZETA's 16.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
113.44%
Cost growth above 1.5x ZETA's 29.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-2.12%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-15.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.34%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
22.59%
G&A growth above 1.5x ZETA's 15.05%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
36.88%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ZETA's 14.63%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.43%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
43.13%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.59%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.40%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.32%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.40%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.11%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.27%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-24.52%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.94%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.57%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-24.50%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.92%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.86%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.71%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.24%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.68%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.