PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.80%
Similar revenue growth to ZETA's 16.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
-40.88%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
37.39%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
19.68%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.90%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
20.76%
G&A growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 15.05%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize overhead control.
-2.10%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.02%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-13.90%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.92%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
89.78%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
65.37%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
89.78%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 68.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
65.31%
Similar operating margin growth to ZETA's 72.84%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
14.71%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
83.21%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.76%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
59.59%
Pre-tax margin growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 50.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
73.45%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
87.59%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 40.68%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
63.40%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 49.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
88.89%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
92.31%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.83%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.80%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.