PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.13%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
51.26%
Cost growth above 1.5x ZETA's 29.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-17.33%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-10.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.31%
Similar R&D growth to ZETA's 14.15%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.40%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
20.14%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.38%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-39.46%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.23%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.46%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.81%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.77%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-38.55%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.83%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.92%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-38.39%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.66%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.25%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.26%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.86%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.