PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.41%
Revenue growth 50-75% of ZETA's 16.65%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
37.18%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x ZETA's 29.86%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
4.17%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of ZETA's 8.15%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-5.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.31%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-6.31%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
20.30%
Marketing expense growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 14.63%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize spending rationale.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.16%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
17.97%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.03%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.00%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.13%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.00%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.34%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3662.50%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.89%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.77%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.52%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-4.55%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.55%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.08%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.08%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.99%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.93%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.