PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.93%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-27.98%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-14.84%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.76%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.41%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
44.77%
G&A growth above 1.5x ZETA's 15.05%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-18.60%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.71%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.84%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.06%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-25.27%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.24%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.27%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.95%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.90%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-28.17%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.48%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.71%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-28.68%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.10%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.79%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.79%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.13%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.11%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.