PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.02%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.10%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.96%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.10%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.59%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
16.29%
Similar G&A growth to ZETA's 15.05%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
7.08%
Marketing expense growth less than half of ZETA's 14.63%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2.03%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-1.06%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.56%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.18%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-13.89%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.16%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.40%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
139.95%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.27%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.56%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.24%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.28%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.57%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.03%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.03%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.10%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.63%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.