PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
47.23%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 16.65%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
27.66%
Similar cost growth to ZETA's 29.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
52.75%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.75%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.68%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
59.65%
G&A growth above 1.5x ZETA's 15.05%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
29.71%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ZETA's 14.63%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.96%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
24.54%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.80%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
75.00%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.81%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
89.94%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 68.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
29.01%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.74%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
86.42%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.76%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
26.62%
Pre-tax margin growth 50-75% of ZETA's 50.07%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
86.48%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
86.40%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 40.68%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
26.61%
Net margin growth 50-75% of ZETA's 49.14%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
87.50%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
85.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.65%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.36%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.