PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-23.76%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-24.06%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-23.68%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.09%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.78%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-2.62%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-11.49%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.45%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.22%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.85%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-36.32%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.61%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.23%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.30%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.59%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-39.87%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.14%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.89%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-39.87%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.13%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.67%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.19%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.00%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.84%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.