PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.59%
Revenue growth 50-75% of ZETA's 16.65%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
15.06%
Cost growth 50-75% of ZETA's 29.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
9.54%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.86%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-19.44%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
12.46%
Similar marketing expense growth to ZETA's 14.63%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.64%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.72%
Total costs growth 50-75% of ZETA's 11.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.46%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.02%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.03%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.63%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.66%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-44.05%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
12.79%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.99%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.81%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.78%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.98%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.04%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.33%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.60%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.37%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.