PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.97%
Revenue growth below 50% of ZETA's 16.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-0.98%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
1.45%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ZETA's 8.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.48%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-6.55%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
1.08%
G&A growth less than half of ZETA's 15.05%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
-22.10%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.66%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.66%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.34%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.31%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.63%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.00%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.84%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.28%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.02%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.86%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.85%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.74%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.59%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.15%
EPS growth 50-75% of ZETA's 41.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
21.57%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of ZETA's 41.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-1.15%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.67%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.