PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.65%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-29.90%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-11.75%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.88%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.16%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
2.68%
G&A growth less than half of ZETA's 15.05%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
-9.25%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-140.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.37%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.41%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.98%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.84%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.06%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.27%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.33%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-104.49%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-22.77%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.34%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.29%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-22.89%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.48%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.78%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.08%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.01%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.39%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.