PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.36%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
0.12%
Cost growth less than half of ZETA's 29.86%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-14.80%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.17%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-0.79%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-22.11%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
20.96%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-13.03%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.34%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.92%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
238.44%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of ZETA's 406.86%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-6.69%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2664.58%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 68.32%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3018.79%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 72.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
35.33%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1441.50%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.76%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1639.01%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 50.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
25.50%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
1007.72%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 40.68%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1124.02%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 49.14%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1002.90%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1002.90%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.10%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.26%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ZETA's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.