PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
34.03%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 16.65%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
36.56%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x ZETA's 29.86%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
33.14%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.76%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
2.57%
G&A growth less than half of ZETA's 15.05%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
46.32%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ZETA's 14.63%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-116.34%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
22.37%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
27.90%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
10.53%
Interest expense growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
42.11%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.15%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.92%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
46.40%
Operating income growth 50-75% of ZETA's 68.32%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
9.23%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-100.44%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
40.40%
Similar pre-tax income growth to ZETA's 41.76%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
4.75%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.43%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
42.79%
Similar net income growth to ZETA's 40.68%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
6.53%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
43.40%
Similar EPS growth to ZETA's 41.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
43.40%
Similar diluted EPS growth to ZETA's 41.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-0.04%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.59%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.