PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.51%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-15.90%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.39%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.31%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.43%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
43.25%
G&A growth above 1.5x ZETA's 15.05%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-11.95%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-142.42%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.21%
Similar operating expenses growth to ZETA's 1.19%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-5.90%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.81%
Interest expense growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.36%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.34%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.78%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.05%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.58%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-800.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.15%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.47%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.13%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.05%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.57%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.26%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.26%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.35%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.18%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.