PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.89%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
17.03%
Cost growth 50-75% of ZETA's 29.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-8.97%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.42%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-26.93%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
11.44%
Similar marketing expense growth to ZETA's 14.63%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry requirements.
231.25%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.62%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
7.35%
Total costs growth 50-75% of ZETA's 11.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
10.09%
Interest expense growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.65%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-17.31%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.10%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.22%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.84%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
900.00%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.18%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.77%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.77%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-18.00%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.56%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.06%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.06%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.23%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.15%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.