PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.87%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.16%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-6.37%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.54%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.57%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-19.09%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-21.85%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-23.81%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-14.24%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.78%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.67%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.95%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.08%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.48%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.30%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.99%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.78%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.28%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.97%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.36%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
5.62%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.41%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.78%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.08%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.07%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.