PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
32.33%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 16.65%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
61.75%
Cost growth above 1.5x ZETA's 29.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
21.02%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-8.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.69%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
22.27%
G&A growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 15.05%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize overhead control.
29.63%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ZETA's 14.63%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-238.75%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
16.71%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
35.71%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.41%
Interest expense growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
32.18%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.04%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.47%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
25.81%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.92%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-222.97%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
22.94%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of ZETA's 41.76%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-7.09%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.40%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.06%
Net income growth 50-75% of ZETA's 40.68%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-5.49%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
25.40%
EPS growth 50-75% of ZETA's 41.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
25.81%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of ZETA's 41.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-0.16%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.46%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.