PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.79%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-28.17%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-10.94%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
7.03%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.18%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-2.59%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-17.30%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
35.14%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.44%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.86%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
29.63%
Interest expense growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.48%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-12.49%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.50%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-12.49%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.17%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
81.32%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.69%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.12%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.74%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-13.69%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.72%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-13.92%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.82%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.50%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.33%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.