PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.60%
Similar revenue growth to ZETA's 16.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
27.05%
Similar cost growth to ZETA's 29.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
9.44%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-4.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.85%
Similar R&D growth to ZETA's 14.15%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
17.75%
G&A growth 1.1-1.25x ZETA's 15.05%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of necessary spending.
32.19%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ZETA's 14.63%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
8.33%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.18%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
24.90%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-3.43%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
38.80%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.71%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.37%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.05%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.90%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
658.82%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.46%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.51%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
51.50%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-18.52%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.90%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.65%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.12%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.46%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.26%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.