PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.77%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
8.93%
Cost growth less than half of ZETA's 29.86%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-5.44%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.86%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-16.17%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-20.38%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
46.97%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-13.45%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.31%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.73%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-18.03%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.82%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.90%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.84%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.14%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.26%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-10.35%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.65%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.99%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.56%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.79%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.79%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.82%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.04%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.07%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.