PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.12%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.49%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-10.47%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.27%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-14.78%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-15.85%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-2425.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.38%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.65%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.81%
Interest expense growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.14%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
36306.25%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 406.86%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.12%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
382.17%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 68.32%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
407.11%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 72.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-194.28%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
413.95%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.76%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
441.70%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 50.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-57.54%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
253.43%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 40.68%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
266.99%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 49.14%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
252.50%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
252.50%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.81%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.29%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.