PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.37%
Revenue growth below 50% of ZETA's 16.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-1.69%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
11.47%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
4.79%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.27%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-19.68%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-19.51%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
61.54%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.74%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.37%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
26.67%
Interest expense growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.92%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
52.28%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
32.09%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
118.02%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 68.32%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
104.96%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 72.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-58.05%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
103.97%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.76%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
91.75%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 50.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
415.56%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
81.52%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 40.68%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
70.64%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 49.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
82.50%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
84.62%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.68%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.67%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.