PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.78%
Similar revenue growth to ZETA's 16.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
26.22%
Similar cost growth to ZETA's 29.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
13.07%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.42%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-15.89%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
26.76%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ZETA's 14.63%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-1046.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.83%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
17.80%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
19.22%
Interest expense growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.27%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.05%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.30%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.72%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.05%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.46%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.50%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.23%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
51.29%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.59%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.10%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.96%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.11%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.44%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.58%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.