PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.45%
Revenue growth below 50% of ZETA's 16.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
4.91%
Cost growth less than half of ZETA's 29.86%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-1.92%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.74%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
12.73%
Similar G&A growth to ZETA's 15.05%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
12.50%
Similar marketing expense growth to ZETA's 14.63%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry requirements.
42.50%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.44%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.23%
Total costs growth 50-75% of ZETA's 11.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
7.55%
Interest expense growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.48%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-6.90%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.31%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.72%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.08%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-370.89%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-21.84%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.19%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-160.20%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
18.72%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.19%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.31%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.57%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.13%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.