PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.18%
Revenue growth 50-75% of ZETA's 16.65%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
5.10%
Cost growth less than half of ZETA's 29.86%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
15.91%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.33%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.87%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
5.22%
G&A growth less than half of ZETA's 15.05%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
9.80%
Marketing expense growth 50-75% of ZETA's 14.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
-971.43%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
7.63%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
6.36%
Total costs growth 50-75% of ZETA's 11.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-2.75%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.16%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
26.05%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.24%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
25.17%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.58%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-13.75%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
23.60%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of ZETA's 41.76%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
10.18%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
48.48%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.52%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.54%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.79%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.19%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.24%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.