PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.33%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
1.67%
Cost growth less than half of ZETA's 29.86%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-5.72%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.12%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-9.60%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-13.91%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
122.95%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.43%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.93%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.30%
Interest expense growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.76%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.76%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.70%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.09%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.78%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.63%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.30%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.69%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.55%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.87%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.13%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.12%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.