PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.65%
Revenue growth 50-75% of ZETA's 16.65%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
25.42%
Similar cost growth to ZETA's 29.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
4.53%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of ZETA's 8.15%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-6.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.34%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-1.48%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
11.96%
Similar marketing expense growth to ZETA's 14.63%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry requirements.
142.86%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.14%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
16.12%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
-0.30%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.57%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.60%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.08%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.04%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.70%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.26%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.60%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.99%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
40.66%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.58%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.53%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.22%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.26%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.25%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.03%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.