PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.85%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-18.14%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
1.76%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ZETA's 8.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.09%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.04%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
4.15%
G&A growth less than half of ZETA's 15.05%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
-0.50%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-52.94%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2.76%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-8.93%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.15%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.30%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.11%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.91%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.81%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.07%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.17%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.97%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.25%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-14.66%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
4.62%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.12%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.50%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.56%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.26%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.31%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.