PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.29%
Revenue growth 50-75% of ZETA's 16.65%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
2.38%
Cost growth less than half of ZETA's 29.86%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
14.23%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.58%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.56%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
20.87%
G&A growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 15.05%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize overhead control.
8.70%
Marketing expense growth 50-75% of ZETA's 14.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
-856.25%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.35%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.35%
Total costs growth less than half of ZETA's 11.77%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-0.30%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.07%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
22.02%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.45%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.96%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.77%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
31.72%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.12%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.91%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-135.24%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
49.70%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 40.68%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
35.73%
Net margin growth 50-75% of ZETA's 49.14%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
49.57%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
50.00%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.22%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.18%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.