PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.65%
Positive growth while ZETA shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
18.76%
Cost increase while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
8.38%
Positive growth while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.83%
R&D growth while ZETA reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
5.66%
G&A growth while ZETA reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
13.74%
Marketing expense growth while ZETA reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-5.56%
Other expenses reduction while ZETA shows 516.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
6.97%
Operating expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.99%
Total costs growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.67%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x ZETA's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
7.81%
Similar D&A growth to ZETA's 10.02%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
9.18%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 418.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.77%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 63.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.50%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 23.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.93%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 19.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.03%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 6.98%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.56%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 2.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
21.31%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.09%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 8.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-2.29%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 3.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.29%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 7.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
9.42%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 7.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.17%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.25%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.