PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.11%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 23.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.19%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 38.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.04%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 14.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.23%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.17%
R&D growth while ZETA reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
13.56%
G&A growth while ZETA reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-0.45%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 8.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
84.21%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.88%
Operating expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.21%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 13.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.12%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.65%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.86%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.55%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 68.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.59%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 109.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.57%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 107.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-168.04%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-8.82%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 13.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.91%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 29.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.16%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-7.70%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 13.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.73%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 30.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.84%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 15.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.28%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 15.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.25%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 0.76% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.21%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 0.76% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.