PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.60%
Revenue growth below 50% of ZETA's 20.11%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
12.43%
Cost growth 50-75% of ZETA's 18.78%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
6.85%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ZETA's 21.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.61%
Margin decline while ZETA shows 0.83% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.69%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 15.61%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
30.09%
G&A growth above 1.5x ZETA's 2.50%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
10.30%
Marketing expense growth less than half of ZETA's 24.70%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
600.00%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.98%
Similar operating expenses growth to ZETA's 11.02%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
11.70%
Similar total costs growth to ZETA's 14.41%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
11.73%
Interest expense growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.38%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.44%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 251.99%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.84%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 15.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.33%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 949.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.85%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 773.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
111.36%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.51%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 27.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.77%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 39.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.17%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.19%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 32.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.07%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 43.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.96%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 32.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.29%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 32.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.29%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.33%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.