PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.31%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-10.84%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
1.78%
Positive growth while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.19%
Margin expansion 50-75% of ZETA's 6.64%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-5.52%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 22.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-32.43%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 8.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-21.89%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-16.37%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 2.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.60%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-14.14%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-24.51%
D&A reduction while ZETA shows 2.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
5.16%
EBITDA growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.63%
EBITDA margin growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.42%
Operating income growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.22%
Operating margin growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1553.33%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.13%
Pre-tax income growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.97%
Pre-tax margin growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.50%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.02%
Net income growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.96%
Net margin growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.32%
EPS growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.66%
Diluted EPS growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.18%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 1.15% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.17%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 0.96% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.