PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.15%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.74%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
24.29%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 16.23%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
9.78%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 5.04%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.84%
R&D growth 50-75% of ZETA's 4.68%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
7.54%
G&A growth less than half of ZETA's 86.49%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
18.30%
Marketing expense growth while ZETA reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-166.67%
Other expenses reduction while ZETA shows 4.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
9.52%
Similar operating expenses growth to ZETA's 8.95%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
17.55%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 10.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.60%
Interest expense reduction while ZETA shows 28.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.84%
D&A growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.68%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
9.78%
EBITDA growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.93%
Operating income growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.29%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.70%
Pre-tax income growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
19636.84%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x ZETA's 113.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-8.49%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.42%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.49%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.11%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 1.88% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 1.36% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.