PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.07%
Revenue growth below 50% of ZETA's 15.03%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
5.21%
Cost growth less than half of ZETA's 14.69%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
5.01%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ZETA's 15.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.06%
Margin decline while ZETA shows 0.18% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.61%
R&D growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.63%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
18.18%
G&A growth while ZETA reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
12.67%
Marketing expense growth while ZETA reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-109.09%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
11.37%
Operating expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.05%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 2.03%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-1.39%
Interest expense reduction while ZETA shows 12.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.46%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.42%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 30.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.30%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 40.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.83%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 27.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.04%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 37.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
72.99%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.47%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 24.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.43%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 34.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.23%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.07%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 25.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.76%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 35.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.45%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 26.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.45%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 26.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.25%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 3.48% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.37%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 3.48% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.