PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.36%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-5.95%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-2.16%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.24%
Margin expansion below 50% of ZETA's 5.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.23%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 7.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-20.07%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 3.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-18.69%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-34.78%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.74%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-8.70%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.81%
Interest expense growth less than half of ZETA's 6.39%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-29.88%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.62%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.97%
EBITDA margin growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.79%
Operating income growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.44%
Operating margin growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
214.89%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.30%
Pre-tax income growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.96%
Pre-tax margin growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.18%
Tax expense growth less than half of ZETA's 251.15%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
4.87%
Net income growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.52%
Net margin growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.91%
EPS growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.38%
Diluted EPS growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.23%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 3.13% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 3.13% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.