PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.24%
Revenue growth 50-75% of ZETA's 9.02%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
13.18%
Similar cost growth to ZETA's 14.14%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
1.70%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ZETA's 6.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.26%
R&D growth while ZETA reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
67.17%
G&A growth while ZETA reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
10.79%
Marketing expense growth while ZETA reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-22.58%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
12.99%
Operating expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.09%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 2.55%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.00%
Interest expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.75%
D&A growth above 1.5x ZETA's 6.52%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-0.45%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 14.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.77%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 27.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.20%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.92%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 18.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-211.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.72%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 8.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.41%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 16.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.54%
Tax expense reduction while ZETA shows 56.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.44%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 8.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.10%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 16.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.38%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 10.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.38%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 10.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.08%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 3.03% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 3.03% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.