503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.21%
Revenue growth below 50% of ZETA's 9.99%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-7.78%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 18.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
4.17%
Similar gross profit growth to ZETA's 5.21%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
3.95%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.05%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 4.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-29.70%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
1.25%
Marketing expense growth while ZETA reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-144.74%
Other expenses reduction while ZETA shows 566.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.25%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.70%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 5.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.22%
Interest expense growth less than half of ZETA's 3.47%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.71%
D&A reduction while ZETA shows 5.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
7.03%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 27.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.25%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 28.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.57%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 19.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.35%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 26.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
635.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 5.41%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
11.48%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of ZETA's 18.04%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
11.24%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 25.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.75%
Tax expense growth less than half of ZETA's 90.94%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
11.41%
Net income growth 50-75% of ZETA's 17.39%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
11.18%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 24.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.82%
EPS growth 50-75% of ZETA's 20.59%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
11.36%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of ZETA's 20.59%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-0.13%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.24% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.12%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.24% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.