503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.30%
Revenue growth 50-75% of ZETA's 11.29%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
4.14%
Cost growth less than half of ZETA's 33.52%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
7.26%
Positive growth while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.90%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.51%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 10.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
33.72%
G&A growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.36%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
7.90%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ZETA's 2.91%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
34.41%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.31%
Operating expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.69%
Total costs growth 50-75% of ZETA's 7.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-2.82%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
9.16%
D&A growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.98%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
12.29%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 27.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.63%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 37.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.51%
Operating income growth 50-75% of ZETA's 14.28%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
2.07%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 22.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
47.35%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 34.67%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
9.06%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of ZETA's 16.84%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
2.59%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 25.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.22%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.74%
Net income growth 50-75% of ZETA's 18.11%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
3.23%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 26.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.76%
EPS growth 50-75% of ZETA's 18.52%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
9.80%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of ZETA's 18.52%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-0.09%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 3.71% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 3.71%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.