PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.74%
Revenue growth 50-75% of ZETA's 16.87%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
20.37%
Cost growth above 1.5x ZETA's 0.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
5.43%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ZETA's 31.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.93%
Margin decline while ZETA shows 12.15% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
7.25%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 18.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
34.12%
G&A growth above 1.5x ZETA's 4.82%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
20.42%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ZETA's 5.87%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-23.36%
Other expenses reduction while ZETA shows 2032.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
15.35%
Similar operating expenses growth to ZETA's 16.50%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
18.11%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 10.23%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
73.14%
Interest expense growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
51.98%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.06%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 47.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.98%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 53.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.51%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 25.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.41%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 36.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-230.08%
Other expenses reduction while ZETA shows 69.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.78%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 29.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.40%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 39.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.75%
Tax expense reduction while ZETA shows 22.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.89%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 29.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.59%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 39.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.00%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 30.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.01%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 30.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.04%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 3.88%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.08%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 3.88%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.