PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.26%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 17.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.70%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 16.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.25%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ZETA's 18.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.52%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 1.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.15%
R&D growth while ZETA reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-3.29%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-0.62%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 11.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-187.57%
Other expenses reduction while ZETA shows 32.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.65%
Operating expenses growth less than half of ZETA's 7.15%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.03%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 10.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.99%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.14%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.87%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 78.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.42%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 81.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.03%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 53.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.30%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 60.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-68.77%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.76%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 37.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.02%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 47.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.84%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.32%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 38.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.58%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 47.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.34%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 42.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.34%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 42.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.01%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 5.64% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 5.64%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.