PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.64%
Revenue growth below 50% of ZETA's 17.29%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
6.37%
Cost growth less than half of ZETA's 19.21%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
3.90%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ZETA's 16.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.27%
Similar R&D growth to ZETA's 6.42%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
17.47%
G&A growth above 1.5x ZETA's 7.21%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
9.81%
Marketing expense growth while ZETA reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-8.44%
Other expenses reduction while ZETA shows 19.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
8.53%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 3.88%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.37%
Similar total costs growth to ZETA's 9.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-12.38%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.86%
D&A growth less than half of ZETA's 33.48%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
2.07%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 1077.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.45%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 933.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.25%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 155.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.24%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 147.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
20.96%
Other expenses growth less than half of ZETA's 142.87%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.96%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 152.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.56%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 144.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.90%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.44%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 187.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.01%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 174.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.34%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 179.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.34%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 165.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.03%
Share count increase while ZETA reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.