PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.33%
Positive growth while ZETA shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.11%
Cost increase while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
0.98%
Positive growth while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.34%
Margin decline while ZETA shows 1.48% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.36%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 10.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-25.51%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-16.12%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
100.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-12.76%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-4.81%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-16.98%
Interest expense reduction while ZETA shows 1847.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
15.72%
D&A growth above 1.5x ZETA's 5.25%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
11.45%
EBITDA growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.00%
EBITDA margin growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.41%
Operating income growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.98%
Operating margin growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.07%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.08%
Pre-tax income growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.63%
Pre-tax margin growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.44%
Tax expense growth less than half of ZETA's 126.27%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
11.94%
Net income growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.48%
Net margin growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.16%
EPS growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.86%
Diluted EPS growth while ZETA declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.03%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 14.29% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.