PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.26%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.16%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
59.00%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.99%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
0.03%
Gross profit growth below 50% of Technology median of 5.33%. Jim Chanos would check for business deterioration.
-9.28%
Margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
2.19%
R&D change of 2.19% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
133.33%
G&A change of 133.33% versus flat Technology overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
39.59%
Marketing expense change of 39.59% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.62%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.83%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
33.70%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.03%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.73%
D&A change of 0.73% versus flat Technology D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-24.02%
EBITDA decline while Technology median is 8.81%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-40.66%
EBITDA margin decline while Technology median is 0.11%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-26.25%
Operating income decline while Technology median is 3.39%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-33.12%
Operating margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
33.90%
Other expenses change of 33.90% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-14.80%
Pre-tax income decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-22.73%
Pre-tax margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-27.34%
Tax expense reduction while Technology median is 5.40%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-8.62%
Net income decline while Technology median is 4.16%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-17.13%
Net margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-10.53%
EPS decline while Technology median is 0.98%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-10.53%
Diluted EPS decline while Technology median is 4.04%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.34%
Share count reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-0.80%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.