PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.62%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.68%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
3.45%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.92%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
5.98%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
0.34%
Margin change of 0.34% versus flat Technology margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
12.14%
R&D change of 12.14% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.92%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.12%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
14.00%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.06%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.21%
EBITDA decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-27.43%
EBITDA margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-10.21%
Operating income decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-14.99%
Operating margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
75.81%
Other expenses change of 75.81% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify control.
0.94%
Income change of 0.94% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-4.43%
Pre-tax margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-87.24%
Tax expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
44.36%
Income change of 44.36% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
36.68%
Margin change of 36.68% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
41.67%
EPS change of 41.67% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
47.83%
Diluted EPS change of 47.83% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-0.99%
Share count reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-1.00%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.