PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.02%
Revenue decline while Technology median is 4.74%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-8.10%
Cost reduction while Technology median is 3.20%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-2.96%
Gross profit decline while Technology median is 6.49%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
1.10%
Margin change of 1.10% versus flat Technology margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.59%
R&D change of 0.59% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
16.29%
G&A change of 16.29% versus flat Technology overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
7.08%
Marketing expense change of 7.08% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
2.03%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x Technology median of 1.84%. John Neff would investigate control.
-1.06%
Total costs reduction while Technology median is 3.33%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.56%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.49%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
5.18%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of Technology median of 7.87%. Guy Spier would scrutinize performance.
-13.89%
EBITDA margin decline while Technology median is 1.84%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-10.16%
Operating income decline while Technology median is 10.84%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-6.40%
Operating margin decline while Technology median is 5.04%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
139.95%
Other expenses change of 139.95% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify control.
2.27%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of Technology median of 4.75%. Jim Chanos would check for deterioration.
6.56%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.37%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
2.24%
Tax expense change of 2.24% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
2.28%
Net income growth below 50% of Technology median of 7.23%. Jim Chanos would check for deterioration.
6.57%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 4.54%. Mohnish Pabrai would examine sustainability.
3.03%
EPS growth below 50% of Technology median of 8.35%. Jim Chanos would check for deterioration.
3.03%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of Technology median of 8.00%. Jim Chanos would check for deterioration.
0.10%
Share count change of 0.10% versus stable Technology. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
0.63%
Diluted share change of 0.63% versus stable Technology. Walter Schloss would verify approach.